Comment by 🏍️ Atomic-Germ
The extreme simplicity, as you call it, is roughly what we were working with before the web bloated all things. This isn't a great platform for desktop publishing, but html/css is. There's no reason to compete, it's a solid system as it is. Adding things like this is exactly where feature creep happens and you're watching videos in your tty before you even know it.
This isn't the tool for visual design. And you'll be happy for that when the internet backbone goes to crap and we're all using allow ad-hoc mesh.
Apr 02 · 5 weeks ago
Poll Results
1. I would support this
█████████▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁ 37%
2. I would not support this
██████████████▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁ 58%
3. Mysterious third option (please comment!)
█▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁ 5%
38 votes were cast.
2 Later Comments ↓
🚀 lars_the_bear · Apr 03 at 09:43:
@Atomic-Germ : I don't think it really amounts to "feature creep" when you want your publishing platform to be as capable as WordStar 3 and a dot-matrix printer.
We could regard Gemini itself as "feature creep" from Gopher. What was wrong with Gopher, after all? It was widely used, and plenty of people said (and still say) "we don't need more than this."
🏍️ Atomic-Germ · Apr 03 at 18:36:
@lars_the_bear 🤷 Dunno it's not a democracy anyway, toss out the two cents it's nothing lost either way
Original Post
Markdown and Gemini — On a previous post, I suggested having browsers support markdown rendering. There's some discussion there, but I decided to create a new post for this to centralize discussion. I don't think the goal should be to replace gemtext—gemtext is a fine format for lots of things. I just think it would be a bit nice to have a few more features. Gemtext feels overly limiting at times and I honestly don't really like hacks like writing italics like /this/ and bold like *this*. Or...