Re: "An updated Misfin specification"

In: s/misfin

— satch.xyz/misfin/proposed-misfin-c-9th-draft.gmi

🚀 cipres

Mar 02 · 2 months ago

1 Later Comment

🚀 stack · Mar 02 at 22:18:

Oh. I thought it was a C implementation.

🌒 s/misfin

🐁 iikorni:

An updated Misfin specification — Hi all, While implementing my own Misfin server (hermes), I started desperately wishing for a version of the Misfin B standard that was a little more formal. At the time, I had not seen Misfin C - so I, sort of foolishly, decided to take the Misfin B standard, and add a bit of technical formalism to it. [gemini link] Blog Post Explanation Having now gotten a little more in depth with Misfin as it is now, I realize...this seems a bit presumptious! Just to be...

💬 7 comments · 1 like · Feb 21 · 2 months ago