FAQ updates

Hi folks,

I've pushed a few updates to the FAQ today for the first time in quite a
while.  Nothing which long time list members, or careful archive
readers, won't have heard before, but it is stuff that I am frequently
asked via direct emails so figured I should finally get around to
writing up.  The new questions are 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12.

Cheers,
Solderpunk

Thanks for doing this.  I think it is a particularly strong point that
unexpected EOFs are better detected by TLS than by byte-counting.

On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:05 AM Solderpunk <solderpunk at posteo.net> wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> I've pushed a few updates to the FAQ today for the first time in quite a
> while.  Nothing which long time list members, or careful archive
> readers, won't have heard before, but it is stuff that I am frequently
> asked via direct emails so figured I should finally get around to
> writing up.  The new questions are 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12.
>
> Cheers,
> Solderpunk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201101/53bd
001a/attachment-0001.htm>

Awesome, thanks!