< Too Fast, Too Loud, Too Much

Parent

~whiskeyding

Thank you for your considered reply, but...even in the absence of ego, isn't this flesh *of* the world, embedded firmly in the web of all life and death? When that world is wounded, aren't all contained within wounded likewise? What duty, if any, does this compel?

Write a reply

~inquiry wrote:

(NOTE: what follows is merely wondering out loud, not presumption of knowing/imparting "truth"..)

> Thank you for your considered reply, but...even in
> the absence of ego, isn't this flesh *of* the world,
> embedded firmly in the web of all life and death?

How can an ego answer a question whose context is the absence of ego?

> When that world is wounded, aren't all contained within
> wounded likewise?

Given the ego-less context, who's there to know whether or not physical circumstances constitute wounded-ness?

> What duty, if any, does this compel?

Does 'duty' make any sense outside an ego context?