< calling it

~inquiry

I couldn't help but take another look, and what stood out most was:

> These problems are in your head and will travel with
> you unless you get them out. You can't flee humanity,
> you can't flee your own thoughts, and you can't force
> everyone to think and act and be the same.

[vigorous, enthusiastic applause]

I suspect my life would be considerably better and less confusing remembering that every moment.

> Look at this pub and tell me you could make something more
> pure, and that it would be better.

Good point.

But in the light of what I quoted of your post first, it's not so much the design/creation of a site that determines its being good, but the attitudes of its participants: affecting first how they see/perceive it and, thereby, how they treat it.

More specifically, insisting that a site and its participants meet certain believe/position criteria before someone graces it with their presence is one thing, regularly nudging it a direction with one's posts/replies is another altogether.

Write a reply