Comment by 🐁 iikorni
Re: "An updated Misfin specification"
@stack - absolutely, haha :)
@satch that would be cool! would be nice to have it active again :)
Feb 21 · 2 months ago
3 Later Comments ↓
@iikorni It's great that you're taking an interest in misfin. Read your blog post and the spec, nice job and saw your hermes project.
Yes people use misfin, i still use it, there's also @roughnecks who set up a server recently. There are many implementations, this is a python implementation (fork of lem's):
— https://gitlab.com/cipres/misfin
Misfin C is the most recent protocol spec and that's what misfin server & clients should implement.
— satch.xyz/misfin/proposed-misfin-c-9th-draft.gmi
Oh. I thought it was a C implementation.
Original Post
An updated Misfin specification — Hi all, While implementing my own Misfin server (hermes), I started desperately wishing for a version of the Misfin B standard that was a little more formal. At the time, I had not seen Misfin C - so I, sort of foolishly, decided to take the Misfin B standard, and add a bit of technical formalism to it. [gemini link] Blog Post Explanation Having now gotten a little more in depth with Misfin as it is now, I realize...this seems a bit presumptious! Just to be...