Comment by ๐ lars_the_bear
Re: "What's going on with california and colorado ageโฆ"
@zipsegv : "The moment this happens, I'm just not going to use that service."
That's always been my attitude, too. But what's going to happen when you need verifiable ID to do _anything_ on the Internet? Even a DNS lookup? Even Gemini?
My experience is that politicians, when thwarted, tend to react by implementing even stupider policies. Like (in the UK) trying to ban VPNs becasue people are using them to get around age verification.
Mar 22 ยท 7 weeks ago
4 Later Comments โ
๐ zipsegv ยท Mar 22 at 19:45:
@lars_the_bear yeah no, we're in agreement. these laws are really bad in general.
๐ stack ยท Mar 23 at 17:36:
GrapheneOS is refusing to cooperate. See HN
โ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47479183
๐ป darkghost ยท Mar 23 at 17:53:
OH NO now I won't be able to buy a GrapheneOS device in CO or CA!! Wait a minute.... I still can't buy a GrapheneOS device there now! I have to get a Pixel and pave it over!
๐ stack ยท Mar 23 at 18:00:
Somehow I think TempleOS will not be complying either... Maybe it's time to listen to what God is saying.
Original Post
What's going on with california and colorado age verification? โ Do they actually have anything to do with verification? Everyone is using the word verification, but any source that actually gets into what the bills require does not talk about verification. It seems to me that the laws are just about collecting age-based information, and using it to not show porn to minors. There seems to be no requirement to actually verify the information they collect. Am I completely misunderstanding what...