Comment by 🐐 namark
Re: "/u/namark/38521 @namark You are violating the Code of…"
people have different viewpoints right, so here's mine:
- I rant about design patterns in a thread abouy design patterns,
- someone decides to take it personally and accuse me of personal attack while personally attacking me
- you banhammer me
cool COC
also do I have the bad boy bagde on me now? you should put the bad boy badge on me already cause I'm not gonna stop using provocative language aimed at no one in particular to trigger people, if that's what you have a problem with, I accept my faith and my inevitable decline to total bandom, IP and all
Feb 26 · 2 months ago
4 Later Comments ↓
🖥️ admin [OP] · Feb 26 at 09:22:
The rule is "be respectful". This is not that:
Massive ego go brrrrrr
Generally speaking, you will be taken more seriously if you conduct yourself in a thoughtful and respectful manner, even when disagreeing with someone vehemently.
You are not banned and have not earned any extra flairs at this time. Just a warning.
Ah, that makes sense, I suspeced I might get bonked for that phrase, so I prepared official defence for that paragraph if you are interested.
a thoughtful and respectful manner
Well, I believe I am. I'm being provocative, but I don't think that's disrespectful when aimed at specific notions and not the person expressign them. I'm also being a bit esoteric I suppose, but that's not to intetionally confuse, just my way of demanding reading comprehension. I might actually be clever enough with this explosive mixture in the future to avoid banhammer after all, seeing what specifically triggered it gives me some hope. Kinda want that badge though...
yo another question if i may, what caused the nuking of my explanation of "to regsiter as", something specific or you just tired of my general vibe? thank
was the diarrhea wasn't it?
Original Post
/u/namark/38521 @namark You are violating the Code of Conduct, rule one. Consider this your first warning.