Comment by 🚀 stack
Re: "Oh, cool, we officially have at least one zoophile here,…"
Is there any sign of anything harmful there?
I saw it a few months back, but it seemed fairly harmless, a bunch of words with high shock value.
Jan 30 · 3 months ago
5 Later Comments ↓
🐡 Breebee [...] · Jan 30 at 04:17:
just popping in to say, i go by it/its pronouns. also attraction != action and i don't support any harmful actions, i just have attractions i didn't choose to have. have a nice day :3
🗡️ The_Jackal · Jan 30 at 04:19:
@stack Given that in both of the 'identities' one has zoophile and the other has necrophile, zoophile, and necrozoophile, I'd be very wary of this user. They also have their own message site where there's users talking about shit like zoophilia (positively), and the 'parawiki' has things such as an 'inclusive nonbinary MAP flag'*. I have a strong feeling this wiki isn't just solely meant to document paraphilias afflicting others. This is all extremely concerning.
🐮 november [OP...] · Jan 30 at 05:01:
@stack I don't know this person, I can't say if they're serious or just trying to be Edgy, but there really are creeps who try to normalize these "identities" by latching onto LGBTQIA communities and pretending they're comparable. And it's insulting to say the least.
If you feel the need to state that attraction != action and you don't want to cause harm... then you know that acting on these attractions would be a harmful thing to do.
So I think the best thing isn't to create pages trying to normalize it because you've already implied it isn't normal and would be a harmful thing to do.
This is stuff to talk to a professional about and get to the root cause of why you feel this way.
We can stop this thread here before it turns into harassment.
Original Post
Oh, cool, we officially have at least one zoophile here, and they even run a wiki promoting "MAP" attraction like it's something to be proud of. =/ I guess that's how you know you've made it as a protocol, when proud abusers start using it with no shame.