Comment by 🐙 norayr
and i think they are. imagine corporate programmer. when the bug or just stupid thing in found in the code, that programmer can't say: it's not me, it's genai. that person is responsible for the code they deliver.
so i think if microsoft is rewriting windows with rust, evely line of code, hopefully, has a responsible person behind it.
someone who read, edited, agreed with the generated code.
Mar 31 · 5 weeks ago
4 Later Comments ↓
🐦 wasolili [...] · Mar 31 at 03:53:
@norayr I suspect the claims of how much commercial code is AI generated is exaggerated to appease shareholders and upper management who have been convinced these tools are drastically more useful than they are.
🚀 stack [OP/mod] · Mar 31 at 12:54:
Because the only problem with Microsoft Windows is that it's not written in Rust.
Now with the help of AI rusty windows will destroy competition.
But seriously an AI assistant is fine. The problem is if the one being assisted is a moron.
🚀 lars_the_bear · Mar 31 at 13:40:
I suspect that converting from one programming language to another is something the an LLM could, perhaps, be trusted to do.
🚀 stack [OP/mod] · Mar 31 at 13:44:
That is just so useful! Then maybe rewrite everything in go.
Original Post
Drew Devault forks Vim — [https link] An AI-free branch.